The ability to bring a group of people together and have them exist cohesively while allowing each to bring their unique personality and outlook to the table takes special skills. Too often things will get heated and words will be exchanged. As the head of the team, one will experience moments of doubt. They will wonder if their ways are right for the good of the group. There are many moving parts. An arsenal of leading high performance teams tactics should be developed.
The first thing to remember is to be a coach and not the expert. It is possible that one is the leader due to their extensive experience and wealth of knowledge but they should not be a know it all and ban input of others. On should allow themselves to be challenged. This is not to say that they should play down their abilities. They should ensure their credentials right and record of accomplishment straight. This will inspire confidence in the stewardship.
Imagine waking up every morning with enthusiasm for work. Energy and excitement to get to work with your team again. Now imagine the alternative where the group head literally has to call multiple times before one gets out of bed. The office is dull and the group does not get along very well off work. It is the responsibility of the leader to have the first scenario and not the second. Inspire self-motivation and excitement to work on the common vision.
A group of people where everyone is being honest about their true self will not always be in complete agreement about things. The key to keeping disagreements from turning sour and remaining constructive is to ban personal attacks. To be hard on the problem but respectful of the person. Ensure the members trust each other and value each opinion regardless of who has it.
The size of the group factors into the cohesiveness and homogeneity. The first concern is the team chemistry. This is absolutely imperative. The composition of such a group should be based on the chemistry. Some people just do not get along. Such should not be left in a group together because a lot of time will e wasted trying to get them to agree. Try to diversify the composition as much as possible.
There is a common thing that group heads like to say- the only rule is no rules. This is a sure way to fail miserably. There should be a well-defined charter. One that is developed by the group as a whole. The charter will have a clear and precise description of the goals and vision. There will be rules of operation. There will also be a concise description of responsibilities and expectations for each member. This way, there will be a structure without stifling creativity and autonomy.
Meeting management is an essential skill. In many cases, some people will dominate the meetings. They do not mean to, their personalities just lead them to talk over others. Ensure full participation of everyone. For example, introduce speed storming. This is a situation where members pair up and try to develop an idea for a problem together. After a few minutes, the partners change up and do the same. Once everyone has interacted with everyone, the ideas can then be presented to the whole group and the floor is left open for discussion.
Sharing the high points and achievements is well and good. However, studies have shown that sharing failures and embarrassments is better for idea development. Laying out vulnerabilities is better for group dynamics.
The first thing to remember is to be a coach and not the expert. It is possible that one is the leader due to their extensive experience and wealth of knowledge but they should not be a know it all and ban input of others. On should allow themselves to be challenged. This is not to say that they should play down their abilities. They should ensure their credentials right and record of accomplishment straight. This will inspire confidence in the stewardship.
Imagine waking up every morning with enthusiasm for work. Energy and excitement to get to work with your team again. Now imagine the alternative where the group head literally has to call multiple times before one gets out of bed. The office is dull and the group does not get along very well off work. It is the responsibility of the leader to have the first scenario and not the second. Inspire self-motivation and excitement to work on the common vision.
A group of people where everyone is being honest about their true self will not always be in complete agreement about things. The key to keeping disagreements from turning sour and remaining constructive is to ban personal attacks. To be hard on the problem but respectful of the person. Ensure the members trust each other and value each opinion regardless of who has it.
The size of the group factors into the cohesiveness and homogeneity. The first concern is the team chemistry. This is absolutely imperative. The composition of such a group should be based on the chemistry. Some people just do not get along. Such should not be left in a group together because a lot of time will e wasted trying to get them to agree. Try to diversify the composition as much as possible.
There is a common thing that group heads like to say- the only rule is no rules. This is a sure way to fail miserably. There should be a well-defined charter. One that is developed by the group as a whole. The charter will have a clear and precise description of the goals and vision. There will be rules of operation. There will also be a concise description of responsibilities and expectations for each member. This way, there will be a structure without stifling creativity and autonomy.
Meeting management is an essential skill. In many cases, some people will dominate the meetings. They do not mean to, their personalities just lead them to talk over others. Ensure full participation of everyone. For example, introduce speed storming. This is a situation where members pair up and try to develop an idea for a problem together. After a few minutes, the partners change up and do the same. Once everyone has interacted with everyone, the ideas can then be presented to the whole group and the floor is left open for discussion.
Sharing the high points and achievements is well and good. However, studies have shown that sharing failures and embarrassments is better for idea development. Laying out vulnerabilities is better for group dynamics.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about leading high performance teams tactics, come to our web pages today.; More details are available at http://www.dianabrooksassociates.com now.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment